From: fachat (afachat_at_gmx.de)
Date: 2005-03-29 10:09:17
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:34:09AM +0200, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > but there is no -L option in the following command line (just a -R > option). Either the text or the command line seems to to be wrong. Hi Uz, do you mean this line: xa -R -LIOPORT -o program.o65 program.a65 There is a -L option, as xa requires the label "IOPORT" to be directly appended to the option. However, I am using xa version 2.1.4h, I haven't checked for a new version. > * In the "late binding" example, there's a sentence starting with a > small "after". Thanks I have now also added a note about character sets, as well as a more verbose note on the loader implementation in the index.html. Andre Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.