On Fri, 23 Apr 1999, Andre Fachat wrote: > William Levak wrote: > > At least that was a coherent description of the circuit. > > > > I don't see where there is a problem. We have 3 TTL level chips connected > > together. Typically a TTL chip output can drive 10 devices. There is no > > potential for chip failure here. Remember, these are not unlimited output > > drivers. for instance, a 74LS20 will output 0.4 milliamps, maximum, > > whereas it's input current is 0.1 milliamps. The 6522, on the other hand, > > can handle 1.6 milliamps. If the 6522 is set to input, it will clearly > > pull the signal to it's level, whether high or low. The signal will then > > either be close to zero volts or five volts. This signal is fed to a ramp > > The Problem is that if that would be true, then the poke would not even > work on the original PET. As I said in the description, in the original > PET the Sync signal (produced by an LS08) and read by VIA PB5 is fed > to a 74LS20. This LS20 blanks the video signal during off-screen areas. > Would the VIA, if set to output, draw the level to close to 0V, then > the screen would always be completely blank. > > Therefore I had a look at the 74LS08 datasheets (see for example > http://www.fairchildsemi.com/pf/DM/DM74LS08.html) and it indeed states > that the chip can source 0.4mA on high output. But when the VIA draws > up to 1.6mA, the LS08 would surely think this is a short circuit, and > happily source up to 20-100mA short circuit current . I guess that's > more than the VIA can handle. As I said, not a healthy situation. > >From the fact that the LS20 enables the screen as it should we can then > draw the conclusion that the voltage level on the line is > still above approximately 2V, which is the minimum "safe" voltage > for a "1" (could be less, depending on tolerances, etc. max "0" voltage > is 0.8V). But it may be close. As you said, it must still maintain a 2V level, which is not a short circuit condition. You can't have it both ways. > > generator. The actual voltage level is not relevant. all that is > > necessary is that it is high enough to trigger the ramp generator. The > > ramp generator controls the output to the deflection yoke by a feedback > > network. You cannot overdrive it. The only potential problem is to drive > > it at a frequency higher that it is intended for, and thus supplying a > > higher effective power output to the deflection yoke. But, the feedback > > circuit limits this also. > > I don't know much about ramp generators either. But some plausibility > checks: > > The VDrive input of the early 8032 schematics (see > http://www.funet.fi/pub/cbm/schematics/computers/pet/8032/321448.gif > expects 5V for onscreen and 0V for flyback. > As long as the Vdrive input is (much?) higher than 1.93V > a current is simply integrated to get the ramp voltage (see oscilloscope > point (4)) A diode (D602) lets the TTL output draw the charge of C601 and the > ramp generator goes to 0 when it is time (see oscillscope picture (3) & (4)) > The DC voltage at (4) is around 1.93V (so the schematics says). > > Now apply the poke to set Via PB to low output. If > the ramp goes a bit above the 1.93V, and then probably above the > voltage of the TTL level (that might be lower than 5V because the VIA > draws it) the flyback could be triggered earlier, because the diode > drains C601 much earlier than it should. But to maintain the sync output, the capacitor must recharge. A well designed ramp generator will be designed so that the recharge rate is close to its optimum cycle rate. Otherwise, it would draw extra power to recharge faster, which would require higher capacity components, and thus be more expensive to build. If you get too far from the designed rate, the cycle will collapse. > > This is about as much as I know about ramp generators. All I can do is > > repeat what several engineers have said to me. If you try to run the ramp > > generator at too high a frequency, it will simply not trigger and you will > > get no output. > > Don't forget that we have to handle pretty old stuff, no CPUs that > analyze the video signal and check the timings or so, just simple > analog electronics. Probably you could ask those engineers to > analyze this analong circuitry with the schematics? > > Later (see > http://www.funet.fi/pub/cbm/schematics/computers/pet/8032/8032034.gif) > the analog electronics has been replaced by an integrated circuit, > a TDA 1170. This could probably handle the reduced Vsync voltage. > > Andre > >  Only one pin and not longer than a second, otherwise.... > > -- > Email address may be invalid. Use "fachat AT physik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de" > ------Fight SPAM - join CAUCE http://www.cauce.org------Thanks, spammers... > Andre Fachat, Institute of physics, Technische Universitšt Chemnitz, FRG > http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~fachat > - > This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. > To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail firstname.lastname@example.org. > - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail email@example.com.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.