Re: REM <SHIFT+L> and $E10C

From: Carlsson, Anders (
Date: 1998-09-22 07:53:57

Robin Harbron <> writes:

> Didn't get the error in 128 mode though - it was weird...

> 1 REM shift+L

> Anyone explain this one?

A guess from a total novice; the C128 has more BASIC words and therefore
needs more tokens, so the routine is rewritten and doesn't wrap like the
previous machine code listed did? The 128 has BASIC 7 if I remember correct.
Btw, the shift+L of course "works" as expected on the VIC-20 as well.

/Anders Carlsson
This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list.
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.