MagerValp wrote: > Andre> running on the 8x96 PET. > > Cool. How big is the memory footprint for OS/A65 2.0? Any chance of a > port for 32K PETs? :) Uh. Of course the embedded version (kernel reduced to scheduler ~2.3k and nothing else :-)) always works :-) But if you really want to use it (numbers approximate): 4k kernel. 4k devices (screen, null, spooler) 1k init process, 1k fsdev (makes devices appear like files) 2.25k fsiec (IEEE488 filesystem) 4k+ monitor 6k lib6502 + around 4k system RAM ----- 26k, leaves 6k. If you drop the monitor (by relying on everything to work), you gain around 4k. But you loose 2k for each additional virtual console (above is for one console. And the 8032 has 2k of video RAM only, so you cannot use the upper half of $8***, right? Can you double check this because I am not sure even for the VICE PET emulation? Thanks) You also have to load the application program to run (or the shell which is lsh for lib6502, which is an additional 2k or so) You could probably trim it down, but I am afraid not that much. And I wouldn't recommend developing prgs for other than lib6502 anymore (which is one day supposed to be source code compatible with Daniel Dallmanns Lunix for the C64) When I have finished the version for the 8x96 the 8032 version should be running in an hour (uh, I hope... After all a plain 64k RAM version in the 8x96 is running already) Andre -- Email address may be invalid. Use "fachat AT physik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de" ------Fight SPAM - join CAUCE http://www.cauce.org------Thanks, spammers... Andre Fachat, Institute of physics, Technische Universität Chemnitz, FRG http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~fachat
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.