Marko Mäkelä wrote: > > I don't think you'll find this kind of comment twice so what is the point of > > automating it? The thing is, if you have a small header file and a relatively small binary, you can easily produce a commented listing. And "LDA #$3c: STA PIA2_CRB" is much better understood when there is a comment "DAV hi". ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/cbm/firmware/computers/business/pet/d/petrom-1.html#F0B6 One thing I would like to have is to set comments (and labels) relative to another label, So that you could move a routine for example and have the comments moved in one piece. Or "lda STACK+2,x" something like that. That's not in recomment. > The point is that when you improve the assembler output (e.g. modify it to > output code for a different assembler), you just have to modify the > converter and run it on all files again, which can take place > automatically. For instance, if André (or anyone else) would fix > Recomment to produce correct HTML, all disassembly listings created by it > could be easily converted. recomment can already produce a assembler output "-noaddr -labels" instead of "-long -html" when producing the listing. Then there also is a listing of labels used. Andre -- Email address may be invalid. Use "fachat AT physik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de" ------Fight SPAM - join CAUCE http://www.cauce.org------Thanks, spammers... Andre Fachat, Institute of physics, Technische Universität Chemnitz, FRG http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~fachat
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.