From: Groepaz (groepaz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 2003-01-25 01:48:20
On Friday 24 January 2003 19:13, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
> Oh, like my lzh extractor for the C64, which is distributed as a patch
> to the CS-DOS SFX header. :-) Boy, it took some weeks to reverse engineer
> that and to come up with a patch, without using any symbolic assembler.
why the hell would one do that anyway? i mean...whats the benefit of using
whacko patches for distribution? (and why wouldnt you use a decent
disassembler, such as IDA ?)
just curious :)
--
___ ___ .___________________ .___________ _______.
c=64 / | \| \__ ___/ \ \_ _____/ \ \ [groepaz]
gb / ' \ | | | / \ / \ | __)_ / | \ gp32
cgb \ . / | | |/ ' \| \/ | \ psx
gba \___|_ /|___| |____|\____|__ /_______ /\____|__ / dc
-----\/-----'---------------\/--------\/---------\/
http://www.hitmen-console.org Hitmen WWW Headquarters
http://fly.to/hitmen-groepaz my personal playground
http://rr.c64.org/silversurfer home of the RR debugger
ftp.musoftware.de/pub/groepaz cc65 dump site
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.4.