From: Ullrich von Bassewitz (uz_at_musoftware.de)
Date: 2002-11-18 20:30:58
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 08:28:51PM +0200, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
> Yes, I know that too well. But it's astonishing that the same cbmlink file
> or disk copier binaries work without patching in VIC-20, C64, C128 and in
> the 264 series. The PET and the CBM II require their own versions of the
> programs - the PET even for every ROM version.
Does that mean that even within the PET series, the jump table or zero page
usage differs?
Regards
Uz
--
Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.4.