From: Loo,W.A.v. (Loo_at_Phys.LeidenUniv.nl)
Date: 2002-10-18 13:16:13
I'm not quite convinced. I once made a rasterbar where my $d021 update was 1
cycle too late, and the first pixel (of the normal visible screen, just
right of the border) definately was the color of the previous raster. I know
the hmos vics (THEY SUCK!) have the grey pixel, but I was talking about the
old vics... I'm really really sure the delay is 9 pixels (one cycles + a
bit).
Werner
-----Original Message-----
From: MagerValp
To: cbm-hackers@cling.gu.se
Sent: 18-10-02 11:13
Subject: RE: VIC-II Info (Multicolour character mode)
>>>>> "LAv" == Loo,W A v <Loo@Phys.LeidenUniv.nl> writes:
LAv> I always thought it had a delay of 9 pixels? not just one cycle?
One cycle corresponds to 8 pixels. Colour changes are aligned with the
character cells, more or less. On the HMOS VICs you have a tiny delay
where it displays light grey ($0f) for a fraction of a pixel.
--
___ . . . . . + . . o
_|___|_ + . + . + . Per Olofsson, arkadspelare
o-o . . . o + MagerValp@cling.gu.se
- + + . http://www.cling.gu.se/~cl3polof/
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.4.