RE: Using a 27C512 instead of a 82S100 PLA

• Previous message: Gideon Zweijtzer: "RE: Using a 27C512 instead of a 82S100 PLA"
• In reply to: Gideon Zweijtzer: "RE: Using a 27C512 instead of a 82S100 PLA"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> I found the PLA contents somewhere written out in logic formulas, but I
> guess I don't even have to mention this on this hackers group..

I once fitted them into a M4-64/32 (TQFP44/fine pitch) which will (hardly,
but somewhat possibly) fit in the middle of a small adapter PCB to make
all plug into the original DIL socket.

However, since the fabrication costs of the PCB were exceeding the price
of a readily programmed 82S100 from Hermes TK in Germany about 4 times I
never marketed that adapter solution.

Rainer

-- 

Rainer Buchty, LRR, Technical University of Munich
Phone: +49 89 289-28401, Fax +49 89 289-28232, Room S3240


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

• Next message: Daniele Gratteri: "Re: Using a 27C512 instead of a 82S100 PLA"
• Previous message: Gideon Zweijtzer: "RE: Using a 27C512 instead of a 82S100 PLA"
• In reply to: Gideon Zweijtzer: "RE: Using a 27C512 instead of a 82S100 PLA"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.4.