Re: D9090 (was Re: VIC-1001 ROM sighting)

From: Daniele Gratteri (daniele_gratteri_at_inwind.it)
Date: 2001-09-18 21:36:00

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ethan Dicks" <ethan_dicks@yahoo.com>
To: <cbm-hackers@cling.gu.se>
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: D9090 (was Re: VIC-1001 ROM sighting)


> I looked on FUNET.  The one described there is the Commodore one.  Mine
was
> different inside - specifically, mine had a pair of TI IEEE-488
line-driver
> chips, the C= VIC-20 IEEE cart had three of the same style that were in
the
> PET/CBM.  There are other differences.

I see.

> If I dig it out again (I forget which box it's in), I can see about
dumping
> the ROM and at least providing a parts list.  I'd probably have to
re-trace
> all the signals to generate a schematic.

Oh, don't worry about that. Actually, I don't need a IEEE-488 interface
since I haven't any peripheral with that standard...
  ____
 / ___|____   Daniele Gratteri, Italian Commodore and Amiga user  / /
| |   |___/   E-MAIL: daniele_gratteri@inwind.it                 / /
| |___|___\   URL: http://utenti.tripod.it/danielegratteri   \ \/ /
 \____|       IRC: FIAT1100D - ICQ: 53943994                  \/\/


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.