RE: Update on my projects

ncoplin_at_orbeng.com
Date: 2001-08-01 03:58:50

>> BTW: 72pin SIMMS may be cheaper, but their RAM is 32/36 bits wide and
hence
>> 1/4 useful without a multiplexer!
>> - Nick
>> 
>but they're (generally) in array of four bytes, is there some good
>reason you couldn't mux them the way you would any other memory
>array?
>ie, tie the 32 bits to an 8 bit bus and mux with the chip selects.
>(/RAS, /CAS)

No real reason other than chip count.... the more chips a project has the
less likely it will appeal to the masses unless it is supplied with a custom
PCB to avoid wiring problems.

>I think it would be easier to find 16MB as 72 pin than it would
>as 30 pin.

Agree, I've never sighted one. Highest I've got is 4MB.


============================================================================
=====



PLEASE TAKE NOTE:

The contents of this email (including any attachments) may be
privileged and confidential. Any unauthorised use of the contents
is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
please advise us immediately (you can contact us by telephone
on +61 8 9441 2311 by reverse charge) and then permanently
delete this email together with any attachments. We appreciate
your co-operation.

Whilst Orbital endeavours to take reasonable care to ensure
that this email and any attachments are free from viruses or other
defects, Orbital does not represent or warrant that such is explicitly
the case

(C) 2000: Orbital Engine Company (Australia) PTY LTD and its
affiliates


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.