Hiya Nate! --- Nate Dannenberg <natedac@kscable.com> wrote: > > If Jeri will include a 65816 option in the board, > it will make things > > easier for programmers who depend on the '816. I'm > hoping she will try > > it :-) > > The more I think about it, the less enticing a 65816 > option seems to me, > of course I have a Super CPU :-) Umm, I did say OPTION. So, I suppose, the emulated 6510 would still be the controlling CPU unless a 65816 was plugged into the socket designated for it. I like your idea of the card restricting its function to that of a video controller when a SuperCPU is present. I don't have any idea how that could be done though. Too many unknowns about how the SuperCPU ties itself to the system. ===== Get a FREE 6Mb webmail box from go6502! - http://www.geocities.com/profdredd As low as 2.99% Intro APR from NextCard! - http://www.nextcard.com/index6.html?ref=aff0074521 PayPal is the FAST FREE and SECURE way to send money! - https://secure.paypal.x.com/refer/pal=profdredd%40yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/ - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tml.hut.fi.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.