On 1/18/2021 6:19 AM, Gerrit Heitsch wrote: > On 1/18/21 1:03 PM, silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl wrote: >> >> >>> On 2021-01-17, at 12:58, Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit_at_laosinh.s.bawue.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 1/17/21 12:34 PM, Istvan Hegedus wrote: >>>> Hi Jim, >>>> Ok I send you a PM. Note however that I need the 48 pin one. 40 pin >>>> one is >>>> good for 8501 replacement. >>> >>> You should also be able to use 2 x 24pin type. I have done that with >>> sockets when replacing the TED socket on 264 systems. >> >> Surface mounted? TH is fine but I wouldn't trust the SM variant not >> to be a potential POF without the reinforcement coming from the two >> being bound as a single socket. There are sizeable forces at play >> when inserting/removing. > > It's still 2 rows of 12 pins which are bound together per 24 pin type. > And then 2 of those. > > I think that should work. > > Gerrit > > I think he and I misunderstood your idea as suggesting a 1x24 (one side) SMT header as opposed to using 2 2x12 SMT headers. Jim -- Jim Brain brain_at_jbrain.com www.jbrain.comReceived on 2021-01-18 15:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.