On 05/06/2018 08:22, Marko Mäkelä wrote: > I believe that CMD must have made some kind of licensing agreement > with Commodore, with some conditions. > I believe they had a license, but if there were conditions then why did CMD willfully violate those conditions when they sold bulk licenses of JiffyDOS licences (not JiffyDOS 1541 product) to the clone drive manufacturers knowing that CBM had sued them and were capable of finding them out? Conditions may have been imposed afterwards, but then why did the drives remain on sale? They were advertised in all of the UK magazines for years.Received on 2018-06-05 10:00:29
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.