Thanks. It seems that the 1001006 PAL board was indeed a demo unit, but we still have no definitive answer; maybe I'll try on Denial, the site owner could be there. I wrote him an email one month ago and never got a reply. Giacomo www.oldcomputr.com > On 07 Sep 2015, at 10:56, Rob Clarke <crock@clarke-family.org.uk> wrote: > > Hi Giacomo, > > I checked both my oldest PAL VIC's (WGB 0691 & WGB 0176) and they both have the 324003 board. > > Rob > >> On 06/09/2015 20:53, Giacomo Vernoni wrote: >> Did you take a look at the motherboards? >> I'm really curious about those low sn VICs. >> Thanks! >> >> Giacomo >> www.oldcomputr.com >> >>> On 21 Aug 2015, at 10:18, Rob Clarke <crock@clarke-family.org.uk> wrote: >>> >>> I've got 2 very early PAL VIC's stashed somewhere in my warehouse with serial numbers < 1000. I'll see if I can dig them out over the weekend and have a look. >>> >>> Rob >>> >>>> On 20/08/2015 13:21, Oldcomputr wrote: >>>> Hi all, this is my first message on the cbm-hackers list, so I will >>>> introduce myself .-) >>>> I've been collecting old computers and peripherals since 1994; I love >>>> stuff from the 70s or 80s, mostly Commodore and Apple but I'm >>>> interested in everything from the dawn of the home computer era. I >>>> have a few consoles and games, too. >>>> I am trying to figure out the motherboard model of the first PAL >>>> VIC20s sold in Europe. >>>> I thought that it was the 324003 board (fab. no. 324002-02, while the >>>> -01 was ntsc) but I found this: >>>> http://vic20.de/html/vc20_germany_1.html >>>> that shows a PAL 1001006 board. >>>> It misses the label and the serial number, so it might be some >>>> prototype or demo unit... or not? >>>> Do you have - or are you aware of - any PAL VIC20 with that board? >>>> Thanks, >>>> Giacomo >>>> www.oldcomputr.com >>>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >>> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list >> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list > > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2015-09-07 17:00:07
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.