Re: 6569 luminances

From: silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 00:32:02 +0200
Message-Id: <2B4D493B-6C72-473F-A225-9F65593C0BFF@wfmh.org.pl>
On 2012-05-14, at 21:49, Marko Mäkelä wrote:

> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:56:46PM +0200, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote:
>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/58002657/y_c_amp.png
>>> 
>>> If you don't mind my asking, what did you use to draw that schematic?
>> 
>> Sure I don't mind. I used the same what todo el mundo uses - EAGLE
> 
> In my opinion, hand-written SVG looks much better than the bitmap output from Eagle.
> Sure, it is some trouble to build up a symbol library, but it is not too much effort for small circuits, and you get full control of the appearance in return. :-)

I agree 100%. It is like output from TeX vs. output from Microsoft® Word™ ;-)

> Recently, I learned some SVG and sketched a few diagrams: http://www.iki.fi/~msmakela/electronics/dynamo5v/switching/

Wow! That's at least as impressive ad Gerrit's ASCII schematics made with vi... if not more :-)

> Next, I might draw a circuit board with hand-written SVG :-) Just kidding, I like the ERC and DRC of Eagle.

I am sure emacs can do the same or better! Maybe with some little extra effort on the beginning :-D

-- 
SD!
       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2012-05-14 23:00:33

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.