Marko Mäkelä wrote: > > I give you the ideas I'm thinking of (for the moment): > > - 32-bits FAT, a cluster = 1 sector. This means you lose 4 bytes on every > > sector of 512 byte (= < 1%). > > Will the whole file allocation table fit in the memory? How do you > address fragmentation problems? There is no need to. My implementation uses one 512 byte buffer for each drive (FAT block) and one buffer for each file. This static buffer allocation removes a _lot_ of buffer handling.... And I don't handle fragmentation problems. André -- Email address may be invalid. Use "fachat AT physik DOT tu-chemnitz DOT de" ------Fight SPAM - join CAUCE http://www.cauce.org------Thanks, spammers... Andre Fachat, Institute of physics, Technische Universität Chemnitz, FRG http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~fachat - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tcm.hut.fi.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.