From: Jim Brain (brain_at_jbrain.com)
Date: 2004-08-25 02:46:57
Christian Johansson wrote: >[CJ] There's only one problem with this. The figures above are taken from a >listing for C64/C128 and NOT for the VIC-20. The original poster of this >thread wondered how to modify the routine for the VIC-20 but I'm more >interested in how to modify the routine for getting 4800 bps on the C128 >(which should be possible if you use 2 MHz I think). > > Yes, I did. BTW, I used NT9.5 to tweak the numbers to get 4800 bps on the 64 at 1MHz Check out the 4800 bps postings on c.s.c., as I forget the numbers off the top of my head. I did not exhaustively test them, just tweaked until I did not get buffer or framing errors. Jim -- Jim Brain, Brain Innovations email@example.com http://www.jbrain.com Dabbling in WWW, Embedded Systems, Old CBM computers, and Good Times! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.