From: Jim Brain (brain_at_jbrain.com)
Date: 2004-08-25 02:46:57
Christian Johansson wrote:
>[CJ] There's only one problem with this. The figures above are taken from a
>listing for C64/C128 and NOT for the VIC-20. The original poster of this
>thread wondered how to modify the routine for the VIC-20 but I'm more
>interested in how to modify the routine for getting 4800 bps on the C128
>(which should be possible if you use 2 MHz I think).
>
>
Yes, I did.
BTW, I used NT9.5 to tweak the numbers to get 4800 bps on the 64 at 1MHz
Check out the 4800 bps postings on c.s.c., as I forget the numbers off
the top of my head.
I did not exhaustively test them, just tweaked until I did not get
buffer or framing errors.
Jim
--
Jim Brain, Brain Innovations
brain@jbrain.com http://www.jbrain.com
Dabbling in WWW, Embedded Systems, Old CBM computers, and Good Times!
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.