From: Spiro Trikaliotis (trik-news_at_gmx.de)
Date: 2003-10-21 18:29:38
Hello Groepaz,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Groepaz wrote:
> ooh...when did they start using integrated i/o chips then? i mean....it wouldnt
> be in every second docfile if it was never used :)
I don't know.
Anyway, it might be the following way: IBM designed the interface "as like"
it was using a 8255, allowing the replace the design with 8255 afterwards.
This would explain why it was documented as a 8255, although that one was
not used.
Just some thoughts,
Spiro.
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.