From: Marko Mäkelä (marko.makela_at_hut.fi)
Date: 2003-08-18 16:17:01
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 03:37:00PM +0200, Oliver Achten wrote:
> Or should i better scrap this idea, and taking the dot clock instead, which
> will give me 4 clocks while the VIC is idle, which will result in 3.92Mhz
> processing power @ 127ns access time?
That has been already done with a 65C02 processor. See the 64'er magazine,
the first issues in 1994.
Somewhere I've read that the PLA would have a 80 nanosecond "access time".
I don't know if it applies to all versions of the chip. But you can replace
the PLA with faster programmable logic, can't you?
Marko
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.