From: Anders Carlsson (anders.carlsson_at_mds.mdh.se)
Date: 2003-05-31 22:25:15
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Daniele Gratteri wrote: > So, should the ROM image be, for example, 8194 bytes long instead of > 8192 bytes (two more bytes for saving the load address)? Exactly. I don't know by what means you'll transfer the images to the computer, but if they are transferred through storage on a 5.25" disk or similar, you're already forced to have a load address. I believe all modern emulators use load addresses, and all the Funet images (before they were put away due to the recommendations from IDSA) should have those attached as well. I don't know if EEPROM burners like or dislike load addresses though, but it's the only scenario I can come up with where one might work with the raw 8192 bytes images. -- Anders Carlsson Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.