From: Ethan Dicks (erd_at_infinet.com)
Date: 2002-11-20 14:58:55
> > Hi! > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:23:49AM +0100, Andre Fachat wrote: > > yes indeed the PET kernal jump table at the end of kernal space is > > quite underdeveloped. In fact many useful jumps are missing as you > > state. > [...] > According to the tests using VICE, my file routines work on all > 3/4/8000 PETs with these changes (the 2001 PET is not supported by > cc65 anyway). By 2001, do you mean the BASIC 1.0 static RAM PET? I have a 2001 that is, essentially, the american version of the 3001-32K... When I'm testing my BASIC 2.0 stuff under VICE, I select 3001 and all is well, just as it is on my 32K 2001-N. -ethan -- Visit "The Seventh Continent" http://penguincentral.com/penguincentral.html Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.4.