The sticker on the EPROMs is identical in font and style to those found on a few other CBM-II machines. Heck, I believe my B128 is the only CBM-II I have with production ROMs in it. Anyways, for what it's worth, my guess is that C= did it, because of the markings on the ROMs, and because of the serial number of the machine. From what I understand from my readings, the first few units of a machine, including the prototypes, usually stayed in house for the product support and software folks to use. > -----Original Message----- > From: email@example.com > [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Baltissen, R (Ruud) > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 12:50 AM > To: 'email@example.com' > Subject: RE: What model C= machine is this? > > > Hallo William, > > > The kernal ROM is most similar to the revised kernal ROM, > > 901244-04. In > > fact, the differences look like a further revision of the > > revised version. > > So apperently someone has been playing with the Kernal. The > question is: was > this someone a private person or Commodore? > What gives you the idea that it is a further revision (and not > older maybe)? > ___ > / __|__ > / / |_/ Groetjes, Ruud > \ \__|_\ > \___| http://Ruud.C64.org > > > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.