The sticker on the EPROMs is identical in font and style to those found on a
few other CBM-II machines. Heck, I believe my B128 is the only CBM-II I
have with production ROMs in it.
Anyways, for what it's worth, my guess is that C= did it, because of the
markings on the ROMs, and because of the serial number of the machine. From
what I understand from my readings, the first few units of a machine,
including the prototypes, usually stayed in house for the product support
and software folks to use.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cbm-hackers@cling.gu.se
> [mailto:owner-cbm-hackers@cling.gu.se]On Behalf Of Baltissen, R (Ruud)
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 12:50 AM
> To: 'cbm-hackers@cling.gu.se'
> Subject: RE: What model C= machine is this?
>
>
> Hallo William,
>
> > The kernal ROM is most similar to the revised kernal ROM,
> > 901244-04. In
> > fact, the differences look like a further revision of the
> > revised version.
>
> So apperently someone has been playing with the Kernal. The
> question is: was
> this someone a private person or Commodore?
> What gives you the idea that it is a further revision (and not
> older maybe)?
> ___
> / __|__
> / / |_/ Groetjes, Ruud
> \ \__|_\
> \___| http://Ruud.C64.org
>
>
>
> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.