The following message was rejected, since the quick fix introduced by MagerValp didn't work properly (I think it rejected all messages posted to the list). Now it should work. Marko ---------- Forwarded message ---------- In-Reply-To: <email@example.com> References: <D4E26D5DAF38D5118BB900508BAF5E2E1C2C50@oeca-ex> <D4E26D5DAF38D5118BB900508BAF5E2E1C2C50@oeca-ex> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 13:18:36 +0100 To: firstname.lastname@example.org From: ken ross <email@example.com> Subject: fwd's CBM/PET question this contact of nime is having problems with his drives that i'm trying to work out through procedures but this part of his email puzzles me . no info as to why he considers spanish to be an option ? ( after all the german versions i've seen still speak english ! ) there must be a custom blown chip in there but beyond that i'm clueless ( no change there then !) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 02:24:13 +0100 >Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org >Both of these two Pets include (three words) one of which is 'ergo' instead of >the 'Pet Basic Version' header. Could the previous user have changed it >somehow??? Could the machines be Spanish imports or something? >Anyway, thought you might know! ?? >http://www.siliconclassics.co.uk ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------- email@example.com http://members.tripod.com/~petlibrary http://www.icpug.org.uk/national http://www.fortunecity.co.uk/skyscraper/perl/316 Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.