fwd's CBM/PET question

From: Marko Mäkelä (msmakela_at_cc.hut.fi)
Date: 2001-10-01 08:29:44

The following message was rejected, since the quick fix introduced by
MagerValp didn't work properly (I think it rejected all messages posted to
the list).  Now it should work.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
In-Reply-To: <281207131.20010928211250@kontros.uzhgorod.ua>
References: <D4E26D5DAF38D5118BB900508BAF5E2E1C2C50@oeca-ex>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 13:18:36 +0100
To: cbm-hackers@cling.gu.se
From: ken ross <ken.ross1@virgin.net>
Subject: fwd's CBM/PET question 

this contact of nime is having problems with his drives that i'm trying to
work out through procedures  but this part of his email puzzles me .
no info as to why he considers spanish to be an option ?  ( after all the
german versions i've seen still speak english ! )
there must be a custom blown chip in there but beyond that i'm clueless (
no change there then !)
>Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 02:24:13 +0100
>Reply-To: siliconinfo@siliconclassics.co.uk
>Both of these two Pets include (three words) one of which is 'ergo' instead of
>the 'Pet Basic Version' header. Could the previous user have changed it
>somehow??? Could the machines be Spanish imports or something?
>Anyway, thought you might know! ??



       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.