On Wed, 30 May 2001, Carlsson, Anders wrote: > Ok. Here it is. The source is "VIC= News no. 2/3, first year (1982)", a > Swedish magazine founded by a VIC user group. Later it was renamed to > "VIC= Rapport" and more or less officially adopted by Handic as the > leading Swedish Commodore magazine until it disappeared in 1985 or so. According to the document "kernal.differences" I've composed on funet, the areas that were listed in the article are the same in both PAL and NTSC versions. > F512 LDA $9120 ?? should be $9110 This bug exists in 901486-06 and 901486-07. > EFF4 BIT $9120 ?? should be $9110 Ditto. > FE60 LDA #0 ?? > FE62 STA $0297 ?? Also this bug exists in both ROM versions. This seems to have been corrected on the C64 (already in 901227-01): FE0D AD 97 02 LDA $0297 FE10 48 PHA FE11 A9 00 LDA #$0 FE13 8D 97 02 STA $0297 FE16 68 PLA FE17 60 RTS > If I am correct, can get new ROMs? I still have a valid warranty. The BASIC is based on Microsoft code. Can you get a free Windows upgrade if you find a bug in it? :-) > So, here we have a few dumps from the KERNEL, and I just compared with > the files submitted with VICE to find they're identical. The next > question is whether Per-Olof was right. I don't know what the X-line > interface is, and which VIA or whatever it is connected to. Does > anyone want to investigate? Could he be referring to one of the CCITT series X Recommendations? Like X.21 or some X.25 packet network terminal? I don't know that stuff, so I'm just guessing. > Hmm. Quite a long mail. Let's hope somebody was interested. I hope so too; it'd be interesting to see a confirmation of the two first mentioned bugs. Marko - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tml.hut.fi.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.