Hallo Ramses > Isn't there an error in the block diagram? I suspect that the words > processor version and cardridge version should be swapped. The P0..P6 are > now linked to the processor and the complete controllbus is now linked to > the cardridge directly. or am I now completely in error? IMHO the block diagram is correct, so I only can think you misunderstood something. What crossed my mind is, this OZ-card is NOT the project called "PC-card". The "PC-card" is a C64/128 interface to emulate a ISA-bus, the OZ-card is a PC-interface with several functions: 1) emulating a processor 2) Real time debugge / logic analyser 3) emulating a cartridge The two blocks, "Processor version" and "Cartridge" (forgot "version"), represent an OR/OR situation. Either the PC-interface is connected to the socket of the processor (and replacing it), or it is connected to the expansion slot. The text above is not the initial version. I think the confusion rised because of using the word "PC-card" as name for a project, and the other time as means to tell this is a card you plug into the slot of a PC. Groetjes, Ruud http://Ruud.C64.org - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail email@example.com.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.