Re: C64 vs 128's font.
Date: 2001-05-11 06:03:36

On Thu, 10 May 2001, peter karlsson wrote:

> Carlsson, Anders:
> > However, the VIC font might be too thin on a high resolution display.
> But then again, the new display circuit might be less blurry than the
> C64/C128, so doubling the pixels as in the C64/C128 character set might
> not be necessary anymore (PC displays generally work well with 1 pixel
> wide characters).

The vic20 character set has a 1-pixel weight.  It works great on the 80 col
screen for the 128, and I'm currently using an 8x8 single-pixel weight font
at 1280x1024 on my peecee.  I, personally, really like the vic20 character

This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list.
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.