On Thu, 12 Apr 101 g.baltissen@hccnet.nl wrote: > Hallo, > > While writing the article it occured to me that the combination of IO1 or > IO2 and $D7xx doesn't sound to bad. This certainly will be atractive to > people with a C128 and SCPU. > > Another one is IO1 or IO2 and $8000..9FFF. The only disadvantage that I see > for the moment is that a write to this area also overwrites the contents of > the underlaying RAM. But I thought it is still worth mentioning. > I still maintain we dont need >256 bytes for the control set ;) If we need to transfer more than 128/256 bytes in a chunk, it should be DMA'ed anyway - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tml.hut.fi.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.