Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > I think that article said that *every* member of the 65xx/68xx series not > specifically designed for use in a C64 would suffer from that problem. So, > in fact, the 6510, 6526, 6581, 6567/6569 would not be *real* members of the > 65xx family. I wonder what is different in the C64: Many other Commodores use the same clock sharing (like the VIC-20, probably some PETs/CBM-IIs, the dual drives and some printers. The only unique thing about the C64 is the ability to actually stop the CPU completely. Nicolas - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tml.hut.fi.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.