Nate Dannenberg wrote: > If a SCPU is NOT present, the card should be able to replace it, and run > programs designed for the SCPU without modifications. After all, it's > probably easier to add a video driver to a program than it is to rewritre > the program to run under a different environment. Isn't this getting silly? Now we're suggesting that Jeri's board is not just a video board, but also a near-perfect SuperCPU replacement/emulator? And if it did do the SCPU thing, why would we bother keeping our SCPUs? -- Robin Harbron firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.tbaytel.net/macbeth http://www.psw.nu/ - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail email@example.com.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.