The track data is written "wider" than an 80-track drive, though, so is it actually incorrect? On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 4:34 PM <silverdr_at_srebrnysen.com> wrote: > > > > On 16 Apr 2026, at 14:12, Jesus Cea <jcea_at_jcea.es> wrote: > > > > On 11/4/26 3:16, Jesus Cea wrote: > >> You could be interested in this: > >> https://x.com/commodoreihs/status/2040555413326672219 > > > > Now a Youtube video: > > > > Technical Deep Dive: 15 second format routine for the Commodore 64 and > 1541 > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74EKB7gdDv4 > > Minor inaccuracy inherited from the previous video is the visualisation of > the tracks on disk layout. 1541 is an 80 track drive but with the head it > is equipped with and double-stepping it is made to be effectively 40 track > drive, not 35 track one. CBM DOS simply does not use the innermost five > tracks, presumably as a reliability safety margin. This means the > visualisation, which shows the tracks spread evenly across the surface with > no unused portion is not really correct. > > -- > SD! > -- - Peter RittwageReceived on 2026-04-16 22:00:12
Archive generated by hypermail 2.4.0.