Re: 8502 vs 6510 undoc. opcodes

From: Craig Taylor <*ctalkobt_at_gmail.com*> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:03:48 -0400 Message-ID: <CAE6OHdWD-dP5=HrZU-19G9TWYx4ZbWF=U5SHyuq8mDB+jBM-Sw_at_mail.gmail.com> · ctalkobt_at_gmail.com

For the most part, I believe so - however when doing the C= Hacking
Undocumented opcodes I was originally on a 128 - and that may have
introduced some of the issues that were reported about the table I created
(that, and potentially interpretation - "one of these days" I'd like to do
it w/ UTF8 w/o having to resort to psuedo logic symbols).

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 3:44 PM <silverdr_at_srebrnysen.com> wrote:

> Are 8502 undocumented opcodes generally compatible with 6510 ones?
>
> --
> SD!
>
>