Re: "Partner 128" by Timeworks Inc.

From: smf <smf_at_null.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 18:07:27 +0100
Message-ID: <065beecc-3e74-e8ef-9159-5489b91619cb_at_null.net>
Could be, though some kind of circuit that achieves the same thing would
surely be cheaper than a cable that runs to a 9 pin d connector?

On 05/10/2022 18:00, groepaz_at_gmx.net wrote:
> One thing i can imagine is that they somehow had bad problems with contact
> bounce on that cheap push button - so this cable gives them a cheap way to
> wait ~15ms before re-enabling the button to prevent it from firing again right
> after the NMI was re-enabled.
Received on 2022-10-05 20:00:05

Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.