Re: "An early Commodore PET"

From: Santo Nucifora <*santo.nucifora_at_gmail.com*> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2022 08:24:51 -0400 Message-ID: <CAO6+Cm5b+1RR_ajxbL9jfZ9=XEjNnJmyrfdieBriwGJD8SjswQ_at_mail.gmail.com> · santo.nucifora_at_gmail.com

Hi guys,

This is my PET.  I feel bad as this was a joke that I completely forgot
about.  It has the usual three stars (***) but when I posted the "fake"
picture, I was waiting for someone to point that out and nobody ever did.

I will change it back to a proper picture.  Good eye Rhialto :)

Santo

On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 7:58 AM Francesco Messineo <
francesco.messineo_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 1:33 PM Rhialto <rhialto_at_falu.nl> wrote:
> >
> > On this page https://vintagecomputer.ca/an-early-commodore-pet/ I
> > noticed this photo:
> >
> https://vintagecomputer.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/PET-2001-8-10051-front-on-scaled.jpg
> >
> > What's to see there, apart from that the screen is a bit blue-ish? :)
> >
> > +++ COMMODORE BASIC +++
> >
> >  7167 BYTES FREE
> >
> > READY.
> >
> >
> > Hm.... +++ instead of *** I Don't think I've ever seen that before...
>
> same here, however the ROM part numbers match what I have on my 2001
> (and on a lot of remaining ones), so how's that possible?
>
> Frank
>
>