> On 2021-01-18, at 14:04, Jim Brain <brain_at_jbrain.com> wrote: > >>>>> Hi Jim, >>>>> Ok I send you a PM. Note however that I need the 48 pin one. 40 pin one is >>>>> good for 8501 replacement. >>>> >>>> You should also be able to use 2 x 24pin type. I have done that with sockets when replacing the TED socket on 264 systems. >>> >>> Surface mounted? TH is fine but I wouldn't trust the SM variant not to be a potential POF without the reinforcement coming from the two being bound as a single socket. There are sizeable forces at play when inserting/removing. >> >> It's still 2 rows of 12 pins which are bound together per 24 pin type. And then 2 of those. >> >> I think that should work. >> >> Gerrit >> >> > I think he and I misunderstood your idea as suggesting a 1x24 (one side) SMT header Right. That's what I thought. And it reminded me when I was looking for alternatives to the ridiculously expensive SMT sockets on BeamRacer and for a moment thought of using the 2x20 (separate - one side) but quickly dropped the idea. > as opposed to using 2 2x12 SMT headers. Right. Do they fully keep the raster when lined-up? Might be they do and then yes - that would work well. -- SD!Received on 2021-01-18 15:00:21
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.