On 7/14/20 5:03 PM, Justin wrote: > The PLA would probably be an easier project for that Google 130nm fabrication project than a SID… Sure, but don't we already have enough PLA replacements? Yes, some of them are a bit quirky and you need to use the right parts (the one with the 2 GALs for example), but who says that the timing of a PLA using the Google process would be good enough? Gerrit > > Justin > >> On Jul 14, 2020, at 10:01, Francesco Messineo <francesco.messineo_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I've lost a batch of the soviet PLAs too, and lost some good ones >> while figuring out that the .jed file on zimmers had the NOT and >> direct input fuses swapped (no comment...) >> Now someone decided they must be unobtanium as the conventional ones are. >> Whatever... >> >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 4:56 PM dave_m <dmercado11_at_att.net> wrote: >>> >>> Frank, >>> I checked the feedback rating from the vendor and it is very good (98%+) >>> with most complaints about slow or non delivery/lost in mail. So maybe I got >>> a bad batch? I think I will give up my quest for finding 82S100 parts. Too >>> bad as there are not many DataI/O 29B's around with the right adapter to >>> program this part. >>> -Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from: http://cbm-hackers.2304266.n4.nabble.com/ >>> >> > >Received on 2020-07-14 18:00:43
Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.