> Good point. This would be more noticeable on some machines than others, > hence it would be difficult to say what is an acceptable use of this > feature and what is not. You'd have to make decisions about the maximum > RAM refresh periods of *all* the different DRAM chips in C64s out there... > [COPLIN, Nicholas.] another possibility is that those of us still experimenting with our machines to the limit could replace the 4164's with 41256's which are pin compatible and have the benefit of a 4times longer refresh cycle allowing perhaps more effects... ---------------------------------------------------------------- PLEASE TAKE NOTE: The contents of this email (including any attachments) may be privileged and confidential. Any unauthorised use of the contents is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please advise us immediately (you can contact us by telephone on +61 8 9441 2311 by reverse charge) and then permanently delete this email together with any attachments. We appreciate your cooperation. Whilst Orbital endeavours to take reasonable care to ensure that this email and any attachments are free from viruses or other defects, Orbital does not represent or warrant that such are free from computer viruses or other defects. (C) 2000: Orbital Engine Company (Australia) Pty Ltd and its affiliates - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tcm.hut.fi.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.