Re: Plus/4 Parallel Port I/O question

From: Larry Anderson (foxnhare_at_jps.net)
Date: 2000-07-27 04:11:26

Marko Mäkelä wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Larry Anderson wrote:
> 
> > for some odd reason I could not define the variable "port" on either
> > the plus/4 or 64...  never run into that one before...
> 
> Did it work on the PET then?  The reason is that OR is a reserved word.
> 
>         Marko

Duh! *slaps forehead* I forgot about that...  When I printed PORT I got
0 so I thought it was something else... but 0 would be the result of P
OR T if both are 0...  :-/  (yeah, I know, all of you are saying stupid
American...  ;-)

-- 
01000011 01001111 01001101 01001101 01001111 01000100 01001111 01010010 01000101
   Larry Anderson - Sysop of Silicon Realms BBS  (209) 754-1363 
300-14.4k bps
     Classic Commodore pages at:  http://www.jps.net/foxnhare/commodore.html
01000011 01001111 01001101 01010000 01010101 01010100 01000101 01010010 01010011
-
This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list.
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail cbm-hackers-request@dot.tcm.hut.fi.

Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.