Re: "Commodore" brand

From: smf <smf_at_null.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:24:47 +0000
Message-ID: <d5bceffa-b34e-2656-a560-e545414c3b7c_at_null.net>
On 02/03/2020 22:22, geneb wrote:

>
> Copyright infringement is not theft. ;)
Image result for copyright is the right to control copies
<https://www.google.com/search?q=copyright+is+the+right+to+control+copies&safe=active&sxsrf=ALeKk00FusstNluj7hB6bC7g23jNfeaotQ:1583230896037&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=9YDwIaX9uVEYDM%253A%252CdXeTNHC5wuBVGM%252C_&vet=1&usg=AI4_-kSFme17KJYPogUWuOjKC2rtjEX2Hw&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiY_J7Ziv7nAhVKi1wKHf9rCSkQ9QEwAHoECAoQAw#imgrc=9YDwIaX9uVEYDM:>
*Copyright*is the legal and exclusive*right*to*copy*, or permit to
be*copied*, some specific work of art. If you own the*copyright*on
something, someone else cannot make a*copy*of it without your permission.

Copyright is therefore something of value. Infringing that right is
misappropriation.

http://www.copyhype.com/2013/09/why-copyright-infringement-is-theft/
<http://www.copyhype.com/2013/09/why-copyright-infringement-is-theft/>


Most, if not all, states have theft laws that substantially track the
Model Penal Code. For example, in my state of Louisiana, theft is
defined broadly as follows:

    Theft is the misappropriation or taking of/anything of value/which
    belongs to another, either without the consent of the other to the
    misappropriation or taking, or by means of fraudulent conduct,
    practices, or representations. An intent to deprive the other
    permanently of whatever may be the subject of the misappropriation
    or taking is essential.
Received on 2020-05-30 01:15:02

Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.