Re: PET 2001/2001N can "write" to ROMs

From: groepaz_at_gmx.net
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:22:47 +0200
Message-ID: <11794181.nzamJqHZms_at_rakete>
Am Dienstag, 23. April 2019, 22:13:22 CEST schrieb Mia Magnusson:
> Den Tue, 23 Apr 2019 06:22:33 +0200 skrev Gerrit Heitsch
>
> <gerrit_at_laosinh.s.bawue.de>:
> > On 4/22/19 10:14 PM, Francesco Messineo wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > Ok, the subject is a pun, but write is in double quotes anyway. I
> > > was wondering why the PET (at least the 2001 and 2001N, the ones I
> > > have), leave the ROMs selected during a write cycle on ROM space.
> > > This of course makes a data bus contention because the selected ROM
> > > will drive the data bus and the 6502 will drive the data bus too
> > > since it's on a write cycle.
> > > I wonder if this can be a factor in the high failure rate of the old
> > > 6540s and the newer 2332/2316.
> >
> > No, NMOS outputs cannot be damaged if they work against each other.
>
> Somewhere I read about copy protections for C64+1541 that let the 1541
> write to ROM more or less contiguously if the software thought it was a
> pirate copy, and this apparently damaged the ROMs.
>
> Not sure which process those ROMs were made of though.

that sure sounds like an urban myth. you can "write to ROMs" as much and as
long as you want :)


--

http://hitmen.eu                 http://ar.pokefinder.org
http://vice-emu.sourceforge.net  http://magicdisk.untergrund.net

I don't know what my IQ is. People who gloat about their IQ's are losers
<Stephen Hawking>
Received on 2020-05-29 21:26:14

Archive generated by hypermail 2.3.0.