Re: ...thoughts on Retro-uC?

From: Mia Magnusson <mia_at_plea.se>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 03:37:40 +0200
Message-ID: <20180914033740.000003d9@plea.se>
Den Thu, 13 Sep 2018 17:15:42 +0200 skrev Gerrit Heitsch
<gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de>:
> On 09/13/2018 12:02 AM, Mia Magnusson wrote:
> > Den Wed, 12 Sep 2018 21:56:06 +0200 skrev didier derny
> > <didier@aida.org>:
> >> for me it would be like  a sheep with 5 legs...
> >>
> >> if  I want a 6502 / z80  or 68000 I take a real one....
> >>
> >> if I want something modern I take an avr, or an arm....
> >>
> >>
> >> I would find replacement for:  6530 /  6560 / 6561 / 6581.... more
> >> interesting...
> > 
> > 6530, 6532, 6526, 6525 and 6523 would be rather simple to implement
> > and it might even be possible to do all in one chip, with some
> > preprogram thing to choose which of them it should be.
> 
> Unfortunatly that's not the case. Those chips are NMOS. With their 
> output drivers you can do things (and they were done) that you at
> least shouldn't do with CMOS drivers.

That depends on how the new IC's are being manufactured.

-- 
(\_/) Copy the bunny to your mails to help
(O.o) him achieve world domination.
(> <) Come join the dark side.
/_|_\ We have cookies.
Received on 2018-09-14 04:02:21

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.