Am Donnerstag, 13. September 2018, 07:53:46 CEST schrieb Francesco Messineo: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:43 AM Baltissen, GJPAA (Ruud) > > <ruud.baltissen@apg.nl> wrote: > > > if a 6526 clone would be simple - we'd have one by now > > > > I see it in a different way: if there was a demand for the 6526, we would > > have one by now. > > > > Take the PLA as example: there was demand for it and one or more guys cam > > with the EPROM solution and others various CPLD replacements. So IMHO as > > soon there is a real demand for it, somebody will create a replacement. > Well, I agree more with Ruud, but the example is not well chosen > because the PLA is easy (if we exclude timings problems, but if you > use an EPROM, you're anyway adding different timings), CPLD versions > of the PLA can be exact replacements even timing-wise. > 6526 isn't so easy, it's a complex piece of statefull logic, but it's > doable. There're probably still too many real parts to start worrying. i've seen far more dead CIAs than dead PLAs so... oh well :) sure, its doable. but nowhere near easy, not comparable to a PLA replacement in any way. -- http://hitmen.eu http://ar.pokefinder.org http://vice-emu.sourceforge.net http://magicdisk.untergrund.net To most Christians, the Bible is like a Software license. Nobody actually reads it. They just scroll to the bottom and click "I agree."Received on 2018-09-13 09:00:21
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.