Re: Reloaded Mk-II compatibility

From: groepaz_at_gmx.net
Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 02:21:11 +0200
Message-ID: <2021712.K1XZpxOlqN@rakete>
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2018, 02:18:55 CEST schrieb J. Alexander Jacocks:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:47 PM, <groepaz@gmx.net> wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2018, 01:43:05 CEST schrieb J. Alexander Jacocks:
> > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 5:35 PM <groepaz@gmx.net> wrote:
> > > > Am Freitag, 25. Mai 2018, 23:26:49 CEST schrieb silverdr@wfmh.org.pl:
> > > > > Wondering if anyone has taken Jens's board for a real spin in terms
> > 
> > of
> > 
> > > > > compatibility testing? Something like really tricky demos or
> > 
> > something?
> > 
> > > > of course. and its about as compatible as a c64 could be :)
> > > 
> > > The only incompatibility that I’m aware of is with the Wimodem, which
> > > causes video interference only on the reloaded boards.
> > 
> > thats not really an "incompatibility" though... just a bad power
> > consumption
> > issue :) (get the power from 9V rail like BOs wifi modem - and all is
> > fine)
> 
> Well, true, but I call it that because the actual C64 and C128 don't suffer
> from the problem.

actually they do, just not all, and its less visible :)

-- 

http://hitmen.eu                 http://ar.pokefinder.org
http://vice-emu.sourceforge.net  http://magicdisk.untergrund.net

Oh, boy, virtual memory! Now I'm gonna make myself a really *big* RAMdisk!
Received on 2018-05-26 03:00:15

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.