Making PCBs from a schematic is also not a problem for me. On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 8:32 PM, Steve Gray <sjgray@rogers.com> wrote: > Oops, I just checked and there are no gerbers online. The schematics and pcb > on github have been updated slightly from the one the group built. Feel free > to try it. Sorry, I have no spare PCB's from the first run. If there is > interest I could make another run. The first PCB is verified working, but > there is some question regarding compatibility with different FDC chips. > Either that, or some in the group have defective chips as not all of us were > able to get it working (see my page for details). > > Getting back to TIB, if I can get working schematics I'd be happy to make a > PCB. I have all the parts already just waiting. The TIB uses PC-DOS format > disks which is interesting, and the speed is supposedly very fast. I'd love > to try it. > > Steve > > > ________________________________ > From: Francesco Messineo <francesco.messineo@gmail.com> > To: cbm-hackers@musoftware.de > Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2018 2:15 PM > Subject: Re: Commodore PLC TIB DD-001 / Drive 2001 > > Ah, yes, that one! > So it's not on my todo list anymore :) > > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Steve Gray <sjgray@rogers.com> wrote: >> Perhaps you are referring to the PEDISK-II clone: >> http://www.6502.org/users/sjgray/projects/pedisk2/index.html >> >> This was a group project I was part of. >> >> You can find schematics, gerbers and various utiltities here: >> https://github.com/mnaberez/pedisk2 >> >> It uses a standard FDC, but a fairly early one. The firmware is very >> minimal, supporting only sector reads. The DOS is loaded from disk and is >> very minimal (6 character filenames). IE: it's not "Commodore standard >> GCR" >> format compatible. >> >> Steve >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Francesco Messineo <francesco.messineo@gmail.com> >> To: cbm-hackers@musoftware.de >> Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2018 1:02 PM >> Subject: Re: Commodore PLC TIB DD-001 / Drive 2001 >> >> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 6:56 PM, smf <smf@null.net> wrote: >> >>> On 20/05/2018 17:42, Steve Gray wrote: >>>> >>>> I was also planning to adapt this design to PET and/or CBM-II just for >>>> fun. >>> >>> >>> That would sure be interesting, though dma on the c64 is very much tied >>> into >>> the VIC chip. So the adaptation might be extensive. >> >> >> >> I'm sure there was a PET floppy expansion that used a "standard" FDC, >> it plugged in one of the ROM sockets plus some other few wires (write >> signal, maybe IRQ). It was on my todo list to make a clone of it, but >> I didn't save the url where I've seen it... >> >> Frank >> >> >> >> > > >Received on 2018-05-20 21:02:32
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.