Re: Wireless - switchless kernal mod

From: smf <smf_at_null.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 08:28:06 +0100
Message-ID: <8dd09c6d-5cf7-5806-4c41-d4f46ed0d460@null.net>
On 29/03/2018 20:44, Nejat Dilek wrote:

> The difference between that 1-wire protocol and my case is that in
> that protocol at least the master is noise immune. This is not
> possible in my case, whatever address line I choose there will always
> be previously unknown 1/0 toggles because of normal use of the
> computer.

The protocol I described will reject invalid data and will restart when 
valid data is received. So nothing in the past should make a difference.

No matter how complex you make the starting mechanism, you should make 
sure it can detect that during receipt of a message.

> Actually it's a good idea to calculate the duration of the line being
> held low or high but in my case it's not possible to continously drive
> this line high or low.

Do you have space for a latch?

Do you have asynchronous serial on the cpu? It might be a crazy idea, 
but you may be able to use the chip select as the serial clock and have 
the address line as the data.
Received on 2018-03-30 10:01:12

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.