Den Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:55:22 +0100 skrev silverdr@wfmh.org.pl: > Besides, Reply-to: is exactly useful for this particular reason: I > send from an address "a" but please don't respond to it, please > respond to address "b", which I give you in the extra header. How a > "reasonable mailer" may elect to ignore that _by default_ is beyond > me. In the year of 2018, who uses a mailer where you can't configure your from: address but can configure your reply-to: address? Or is this a way to get around SMTP servers which will only allow mails from certain domains? This usage seems like some residue from the command line mail in UNIX machies from the 80's and early 90's... -- (\_/) Copy the bunny to your mails to help (O.o) him achieve world domination. (> <) Come join the dark side. /_|_\ We have cookies.Received on 2018-03-24 23:02:50
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.