> On 2018-03-13, at 09:57, Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz@musoftware.de> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:34:45AM +0100, Gerrit Heitsch wrote: >> When looking at the header, I also don't see a reply-to: line. I do see a >> 'Mail-Followup-To:' set to the list. Does this behave differently? > > Strange. All mails I receive via the list have a "Reply-To:" header and this > is also what is configured. And, there is no "Mail-Followup-To:" header in the > mails. > > Can someone else please check this? Yup, strange - indeed. I get: [...] Mail-Followup-To: cbm-hackers@musoftware.de References: <20180312182954.GA30498@trixie.musoftware.de> [...] Errors-To: postmaster@musoftware.de List-Help: <mailto:cbm-hackers+help@musoftware.de> List-Id: "CBM Hackers Mailing List" <cbm-hackers.list-id.musoftware.de> List-Owner: <mailto:uz@musoftware.de> List-Post: <mailto:cbm-hackers@musoftware.de> List-Subscribe: <mailto:cbm-hackers+subscribe@musoftware.de> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cbm-hackers+unsubscribe@musoftware.de> Precedence: list Reply-To: cbm-hackers@musoftware.de [...] And seem to have no problems replying to the list by hitting simple "reply", as mandated by the presence of the "Reply-To" header. If Gerrit doesn't receive the said header then something smells fishy in the config as I don't expect any MTA to strip the config on the message's way. Are there any "groupings" of subscribers or anything that would differentiate how subscribers are "treated"? -- SD! - http://e4aws.silverdr.com/Received on 2018-03-14 22:54:09
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.