On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:22:55PM +0100, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > > What you say sounds a bit old-fashioned, but this list is partially > old-fashioned so it's ok:) This is not about processing mailing lists on the client side. As you say, the List-Id: header works fine for that (and there are several other options). This is about the mailing list software *rewriting the email*, changing the displayed addressees. It should not, doing this is lying, it causes more problems than it solves (it solves nothing, so that is obvious). > Anyway, as long as no one complains, I will leave the headers as they are now. > It worked for years with majordomo. Thanks for the feedback! And again, thank you for running this! It all works fine now as far as I see (well, "religious" wars about Reply-To: notwithstanding: as everyone knows that header is just terribly misguided and your MUA should ignore it when doing reply-to-sender :-) ) SegherReceived on 2018-03-14 22:48:45
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.