On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:01 PM, And Fachat <afachat@gmx.de> wrote: > I "invented" the the d67 format in Vice to store DOS 1 images with 670 > blocks free analogous to th d64 image if that is the change you refer to. > Regards, > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list > The d67 disks have one more sector per track in one of the speed zones. nope, I'm writing .d64 images to a DOS-2 3040 (effectively a 4040), so the image is correct for the DOS version I have on my drive. > > André > > > Am 5. März 2018 22:07:14 schrieb Francesco Messineo > <francesco.messineo@gmail.com>: > >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:47 PM, <silverdr@wfmh.org.pl> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 2018-03-05, at 21:32, Francesco Messineo >>>> <francesco.messineo@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:56 PM, <silverdr@wfmh.org.pl> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-03-05, at 14:14, Francesco Messineo >>>>>> <francesco.messineo@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This is usually not a big problem, but the disk needs a VALIDATE >>>>>> command after it has been transferred. >>>>>> Does anyone understand why it happens? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> DOS differences? DOS differs between the two. My guess is that 1541 >>>>> shows static data stored in the directory sector, while the other one uses >>>>> actual sector's metadata. >>>> >>>> >>>> I don't get what you mean. >>> >>> >>> I would have to check exactly what the differences are but there are >>> other people who I bet have them in their heads ;-) while I vaguely recall >>> that the DOS 2.6 in 1541 is not the same as DOS 2.x in other drives. This >>> means there may be nuance differences, and if you write a D64 (from a 1541 >>> disk?) to another drive using DOS 2.x things like you describe may show. >>> Once you re-VALIDATE, the drive updates the metadata to what it expects, >>> rather than what 1541 would expect. >> >> >> I would expect that cbmlink just writes sectors, starting from 1,0 and >> ending to 35,16. I don't think it even knows about directory, BAM and >> so on. On a 1541, even disk id (the two characters you give at format >> time) gets changed from the .d64 image. On a 3040 they don't. >> I don't know how much "metadata" is present on a .d64 image though. >> F >> >> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list > > > > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2018-03-06 00:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.