On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 10:59 PM, André Fachat <afachat@gmx.de> wrote: > > Am 5. November 2017 10:36:58 PM schrieb Francesco Messineo > <francesco.messineo@gmail.com>: > >> On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 10:27 PM, André Fachat <afachat@gmx.de> wrote: ... >>>> >>> >>> The problem with the CBM IEEE488 is that it has non-standard timing >>> properties. >> >> >> >> I didn't know that, so I've always read/wrote successfully to various >> HP instruments with my 3032 and simple basic commands >> (voltmeters, universal counters, signal generators mostly, but also an >> HP-IB clock). >> I hope now everything won't stop working :) > > > That worked with standard BASIC commands? Wow. Maybe they were fast enough. > > IIRC the PET timing resulted in having to load the next byte in advance > possibly from disk, because not reacting quickly enough to a read request > results in a timeout. sure, standard OPEN, PRINT, INPUT (some GET too). I've followed the examples listed in this book: https://archive.org/details/PET_and_the_IEEE488_Bus_1980_McGraw-Hill Frank Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-11-05 23:00:46
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.